Posts Tagged "alternative medicine"

Evidence

Posted by Liz on May 19, 2014 in menopause | 0 comments

A few weeks ago, I found myself in the midst of a discussion about the value of acupuncture for a variety of diseases. And I quickly realized that there was no value in continuing the dialogue as the person who had started the discussion had no interest in hearing anything but his own point of view.

This is commonplace in allopathic, or Western Medicine.

There is a word that is thrown around a lot in scientific circles: evidence. If something has not proven beneficial according to scientific standards that rely on a specific framework of measures, then it has no value. However, in my small circle, value is defined a bit differently and evidence, taken as a grain of salt because not everything can be explained away by science. Or by a clinical trial that creates an artificial environment to evaluate benefit. And practitioners who rely on nothing but this artifice, I posit that perhaps it is their patients who suffer the most, the reason being that even the standards aren’t truly standardized.

Several years ago, Mike Clarke from the School of Nursing and Midwifery at Trinity College in Dublin wrote a great article  about the need to standardize results of studies for a specific disease ( in this case, rheumatoid arthritis). He defined the problem as follows:

“Every year, millions of journal articles are added to the tens of millions that already exist in the health literature, and tens of millions of web pages are added to the hundreds of millions currently available. Within these, there are many tens of thousands of research studies which might provide the evidence needed to make well-informed decisions about healthcare. The task of working through all this material is overwhelming enough without then finding the studies of relevance to the decision you wish to make…”

So what do you do? A few key points:

• Consider that every study has the potential for bias. Perhaps researchers are using 7 instruments to measure depression and only highlight findings from 3 of these in order to preserve the most positive or significant results. Clearly, the reader is being led towards certain outcomes and away from others. And regardless of what one believes, statistical analyses do not always reveal the truth.
• Study designs, types of patients studied, age of patients studied, gender, you name, can differ so it’s difficult, if not impossible to draw definitive conclusions when comparing results of one to another.
• Another issue of great interest to practitioner of Western medicine is whether or not a study is controlled. This means that two groups are compared that are identical in every way except one group is given an experimental treatment and the other, a placebo or standardized treatment. Note that often, real world conditions are often recreated rather than conducted in a real world setting and many studies are not controlled, meaning that the science behind the findings is questionable. And, what is often missing in these studies is the individualization of treatment – no one patient responds the same way as the other. Importantly, Eastern medicine recognizes this and adjusts treatment accordingly.
• I can’t emphasize this last point enough: alternative and complementary medicines are still incompletely understood among many practitioners of Western medicine. What’s more, agents are not regulated carefully and manufacturing practices may vary. Consequently, studies of these agents or modalities are often inconclusive. And of course, often underfunded and under-appreciated.

I’ve written several times about the importance of consulting a practitioner or medical expert before embarking on any regimen for peri- or postmenopausal symptoms. In fact, you should consult several and then compile the information to devise a plan that works best for you. You may need to try different combinations before you find the key to your individual health. Yet, if you only see someone once, at least that dialogue may be useful for initially defining a regimen that may work best for you and what you’re going through. For those of you who live off the beaten track without access to a good practitioner,  excellent resources like Medline or the American Botanical Council may be be of help in discerning what’s what.

The short answer is that there are no short answers. But with careful guidance and a bit of prudence, you may just be able see the light and smooth out the bumps on this rollercoaster ride we’re all on.

Alternative medicine and the ‘pause: what your gynecologist is thinking

Posted by Liz on Sep 30, 2013 in menopause | 0 comments

Women rank among the highest consumers of complementary and alternative medicine for their healthcare, and according to the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, age matters. In fact, the largest percentage of adults reporting that they use alternative medicine strategies are 50 to 59 years old, and as many as 42% discuss their use with their doctors. However, what does your gynecologist think about complementary and alternative medicine use? Is she or he supportive and what modalities tend to rank highest in terms of recommendations or endorsements? Moreover, how do gynecologists differ in their opinions?

In the U.S., most ob/gyns appear to believe that convention medicine practices for reproductive issues might benefit by the integration of complementary strategies. However, most of the positive beliefs focus on biofeedback, chiropractic, acupuncture or meditation. Conversely, the doctors report that they would not recommend dietary changes or Traditional Chinese Medicine and a majority were not strong supporters of herbal medicine. This is in direct conflict with German gynecologists. But why should we care about the Germans and what they think!!!?

To digress, I don’t know how many of you are familiar with the Commission E Monographs but, they comprise the world’s leading scientific summaries on the use of medicinal herbs in health and disease. In the late 1970s, the German Ministry of Health established Commission E, a panel of experts charged with evaluating the safety and efficacy of the herbs available in pharmacies for general use. In all, the group published 380 herbal monographs that are considered  “the most accurate information available in the entire world on the safety and efficacy of herbs and phytomedicines.”  Hence, the Germans definitely have a leg up when it comes to alternative medicine, at least when it comes to the use of herbal alternatives.

So, let’s take a look at a similar survey experience newly published in Complementary Therapies in Medicine,  in which over 2,500 respondents indicated a familiarity with the use of alternative medicine specifically for menopausal symptoms. Almost all of the gynecologists had some experience with black cohosh, chaste tree berry and St. John’s Wort and believed them to be effective. And the modality that they felt was most effective? Lifestyle changes and alteration (think: change in dietary habits, physical activity, reduction of stress, etc). The least effective strategies, at least in the eyes of German doctors, were  yoga, acupuncture and homeopathy.

The researchers point out that the viewpoint of German doctors is important because these practitioners play an important and consistent role counseling women who complain of menopausal symptoms. The same is true for their U.S. counterparts.  And yet, despite the wealth of data in the Commission E monographs, many doctors still continue to question effectiveness and scientific evidence supporting the use of alternatives.

Will this make a difference with regard to the choices that women are making? Probably not, because as I’ve been writing for years, one size does not fit all, especially when it comes to weighing the benefits versus the risks of hormone replacement.

The next time you have your annual with your gynecologist, find out what she or he thinks of complementary and alternative and strategies and most of all, ask why. What she or he is thinking might not be aligned with what you find works best for you.

Wednesday Bubble: Are you dazed and confused?

Posted by Liz on Dec 22, 2010 in women's health | 6 comments

Every now and then I like to reach into the Flashfree archives and repost a piece that either has lasting relevance or is a must-read for those of you who are new to the blog. This post originally ran in May of 2008 but continues to occupy the top ten list of importance in my mind. The topic? How do you discern information in a study and what do you need to look for. Plus, there’s an added bonus for all you Led Zeppelin fans.

Today’s Bubble – are you dazed and confused?

[youtube=http://youtube.com/watch?v=Xajqf-PhO8s&feature=related]

A gal pal mentioned to me this morning that she often feels so confused about study findings proving or disproving the value of certain medications or herbs that she often just throws up her hands and does nothing. Many of us are as dazed and confused as she is so that I thought that a few key points about clinical studies might help.

Mike Clarke from the School of Nursing and Midwifery at Trinity College in Dublin wrote a great article last year about the need to standardize results of studies for a specific disease ( in this case, rheumatoid arthritis). He defined the problem as follows:

“Every year, millions of journal articles are added to the tens of millions that already exist in the health literature, and tens of millions of web pages are added to the hundreds of millions currently available. Within these, there are many tens of thousands of research studies which might provide the evidence needed to make well-informed decisions about healthcare. The task of working through all this material is overwhelming enough without then finding the studies of relevance to the decision you wish to make…”

So what do you do? A few key points:

• Consider that every study has the potential for bias. Perhaps researchers are using 7 instruments to measure depression and only highlight findings from 3 of these in order to preserve the most positive or significant results. Clearly, the reader is being led towards certain outcomes and away from others.
• Study designs, types of patients studied, age of patients studied, gender, you name, can differ so it’s difficult, if not impossible to draw definitive conclusions when comparing results of one to another.
• Another issue of great interest to practitioner of Western medicine is whether or not a study is controlled. This means that two groups are compared that are identical in every way except one group is given an experimental treatment and the other, a placebo or standardized treatment. Note that often, real world conditions are often recreated rather than conducted in a real world setting and many studies are not controlled, meaning that the science behind the findings is questionable.
• Alternative and complementary medicines are still incompletely understood among many practitioners of Western medicine. What’s more, products are not regulated as carefully as medicinal agents and manufacturing practices vary. Consequently, studies of these agents or modalities are often inconclusive. And of course, often underfunded and under-appreciated.

No wonder we all feel so dazed and confused!

I’ve written several times about the importance of consulting a practitioner or medical expert before embarking on any regimen for perimenopausal symptoms. Even if you only see someone once, at least that dialogue may be useful for defining a regimen that may work best for you and what you’re going through. And if you live off the beaten track without access toa good practitioner, well then excellent resources like Medline or the American Botanical Council may be be of help in discerning what’s what.

The short answer is that there are no short answers. But with careful guidance and a bit of prudence, you may just be able see the light and smooth out the bumps on this rollercoaster ride we’re all on.

Dazed and Confused – Revisited

Posted by Liz on May 31, 2010 in herbal medicine, menopause | 2 comments

Two years ago i wrote a post about the confusion surrounding therapies, effectiveness, and discerning right from wrong when it comes to clinical trials. Herbal and integrative therapies are perfect examples of the grey areas; many trials have not incorporated some of the most important tenets supporting the use of these strategies, most important of which is individualization. Hence, I wanted to share the post with you again, and hopefully, spark some dialogue that might lead to improvements in how we study and write about the therapies that are offered to patients.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pau8Zf7srlU]

A gal pal mentioned to me this morning that she often feels so confused about study findings proving or disproving the value of certain medications or herbs that she often just throws up her hands and does nothing. Many of us are as dazed and confused as she is so that I thought that a few key points about clinical studies might help.

Mike Clarke from the School of Nursing and Midwifery at Trinity College in Dublin wrote a great article a few years ago about the need to standardize results of studies for a specific disease ( in this case, rheumatoid arthritis). He defined the problem as follows:

“Every year, millions of journal articles are added to the tens of millions that already exist in the health literature, and tens of millions of web pages are added to the hundreds of millions currently available. Within these, there are many tens of thousands of research studies which might provide the evidence needed to make well-informed decisions about healthcare. The task of working through all this material is overwhelming enough without then finding the studies of relevance to the decision you wish to make…”

So what do you do? A few key points:

• Consider that every study has the potential for bias. Perhaps researchers are using 7 instruments to measure depression and only highlight findings from 3 of these in order to preserve the most positive or significant results. Clearly, the reader is being led towards certain outcomes and away from others.
• Study designs, types of patients studied, age of patients studied, gender, you name, can differ so it’s difficult, if not impossible to draw definitive conclusions when comparing results of one to another.
• Another issue of great interest to practitioner of Western medicine is whether or not a study is controlled. This means that two groups are compared that are identical in every way except one group is given an experimental treatment and the other, a placebo or standardized treatment. Note that often, real world conditions are often recreated rather than conducted in a real world setting and many studies are not controlled, meaning that the science behind the findings is questionable.
• Alternative and complementary medicines are still incompletely understood among many practitioners of Western medicine. What’s more, products are not regulated as carefully as medicinal agents and manufacturing practices vary. Consequently, studies of these agents or modalities are often inconclusive. And of course, often underfunded and under-appreciated.

No wonder we all feel so dazed and confused!

I’ve written several times about the importance of consulting a practitioner or medical expert before embarking on any regimen for perimenopausal symptoms. Even if you only see someone once, at least that dialogue may be useful for defining a regimen that may work best for you and what you’re going through. And if you live off the beaten track without access toa good practitioner, well then excellent resources like Medline or the American Botanical Council may be be of help in discerning what’s what.

The short answer is that there are no short answers. But with careful guidance and a bit of prudence, you may just be able see the light and smooth out the bumps on this rollercoaster ride we’re all on.

My Dream: West Meets East…Someday

Posted by Liz on Sep 4, 2008 in herbal medicine, Meditation/mindfulness therapy, women's health | 3 comments

In 2005, a panel convened by the National Institutes of Health issued a statement emphasizing that menopause is not a disease. Yet, only yesterday, I ran across a newly-issued primer on menopause that is geared towards primary care physicians. In the introductory paragraph, I found the following statement:

“Managing menopausal health requires an ongoing effort to keep up with date with data on medical management of menopausal symptoms and treatments designed to prevent a number of disabling conditions associated with menopause and aging…”

Delving deeper,  I found only eight paragraphs devoted to alternative therapies (namely, phytogestrogens, black cohosh and bioidentical hormones). What jumps out on the one full page on which they are reviewed are statements such as:

“…controversy regarding long-term safety issues.” (black cohosh)

“…these same hormones are used in less expensive, FDA-approved estrogen products.” (bioidentical hormones)

“…evidence to date suggests that phytoestrogens do not ameliorate hot flushes or other menopausal symptoms. In addition there are not data to support the safety of long-term therapy with phytoestrogens and other herbal medications.” (phytoestrogens).

I’ve got a few bones to pick.

1. Historically, controlled studies with herbal preparations have been underfunded and undersupported by national institutions in this country, which is why the Western practitioner often claims “scant evidence.” Yet, if you do a search on alternative therapies on PubMed, there appears to be a growing interest in their utility and an increasing amount of time and resources devoted to studying them. Studies are published regularly in peer-reviewed journals such as Menopause. I’ve blogged about controlled evidence on a regular basis for months now. And, even the Nationa l Institutes of Health is in on the act; with trials currently underway evaluating the role of meditation, soy estrogens, herbal alternatives (e.g. black cohosh, red clover) for menopausal symptoms.
2. The controversy over long-term safety issues and black cohosh is being seriously addressed. I blogged about this only a week ago, noting that the National Institutes of Health Office of Dietary Supplements has publicly stated that millions of individuals have safely used black cohosh with no ill effects.
3. The North American Menopause Society-sponsored monograph highlights several advantages that bioidentical/compounded hormones might offer over conventional products, including greater dosing flexibility, lower doses for women who are especially sensitive and the avoidance of potential allergens.

The primer to which I refer was developed specifically to help primary care physicians understand the challenges that their menopausal patients face so that they can provide better care. However, the monograph does a great disservice by its sole emphasis on Western medical approaches verses Eastern whole-body approaches.

Physicians- if you’re listening, hear this:

MENOPAUSE IS NOT A DISEASE AND SHOULDN’T BE TREATED OR APPROACHED AS ONE.

A few thoughts:

• Please review your data, read alternative peer-reviewed journals and educate yourselves about  alternatives for your patients who have been scared off by the negative findings surrounding HRT and antidepressants and other pharmaceuticals.
• Pay attention to the fact that well-respected journals such as Menopause and Climacteric and the Journal of the British Menopause Society actually devote pages to alternative therapies that have been evaluated in well-controlled studies.
• Embrace multidisciplinary collaboration and invite educated and credentialled alternative practitioners into your fold who might be able to offer you and your patients important solutions when Western ways fail.

Over 5,000 women enter menopause daily. Many of these women are going to call on your for help with managing this very natural transition that we call the menopause. Why not take a moment and meet the challenge without pigeonholing it?

Thoughts anyone?