A week ago, I wrote a post on crowdsourcing menopause with the intent of leveraging the collective force and spirit of women for the better good, or more specifically for our health and wellbeing as we age. I wrote the post just prior to attending the Epatient Connections 2010 Conference in Philadelphia, two of the most inspiring and provocative days that I’ve spent in some time.
You may not be familiar with the term “epatient” but it’s become a buzzword in the health world. And yet, the epatient is a concept that continues to evolve and is not entirely understood by practitioners or researchers or even by many patients themselves. However, like crowdsourcing, the epatient movement has sparked an interest in consumer engagement, participation, collaboration, sharing and connection, all in hopes, as my friend Jane Sarasohn-Kahn implies on her fine synopsis of last week’s conference, of building a foundation of trust upon which health and wellbeing can thrive.
So where do women fit into the epatient movement?
As women, we have long stood on the sidelines as researchers apply study findings in men to our health concerns, as insurers characterize natural life events such as pregnancy as “pre-existing conditions” and on a more personal note, as battle lines jave been drawn between those who insist that menopause is a disease that needs to be treated and those who want to address symptoms in a kinder, more gentler, holistic fashion. Yet, regardless of age or mandate, women need to fully engage in decisions that being made about their healthcare.
A key component of engagement is access: access to health records and notes, access to plans of action and strategies, access to our healthcare practitioners when we need them, access to the right people, to the right information and to the right line of thinking. And at times, access means going round and round and around before we are able to cross imaginary lines that heed our progress and find the path to health. My friend Regina Holliday, a Washington, DC-based patients rights arts advocate, has been leading the fight for access since the death of her husband in June, 2009.
While Regina’s fight is not gender- but people-based, she has demonstrated that women can be powerful advocates for themselves and those they care about, and that advocacy is often borne out of resolve, love and self-respect. Moreover, Regina has shown time and again that sometimes, the smallest gesture can resonate the loudest, a flick of the paintbrush, a line in a poem.
James Russell Lowell once said that “the eye is the notebook of the poet.” For Regina, the eye is her art and her mission, and the window to what has become her soul’s work. At the epatient conference, Regina stood onstage and invited a glimpse through that window. And what resonated most was her resolve self respect — as a woman, a mother, an advocate and an artist. Her path is unique and yet universal because it is about support, participation, engagement and love. And I suspect that Regina will continue to go round and round until her path is fully illuminated and she reaches her goal.
Below are Regina’s wheels. I believe that as women, as patients and as mothers, friends, wives and lovers, we can use our resolve to crowdsource and advocate for our health and well-being. What are your wheels? What is your path? And what are you willing to fight for?
Death of the Paper Transfer© All Rights Reserved. R. Holliday.
The Wheals on the Bus By Regina Holliday 3-17-10
The wheels, the wheels: they are a turning,
And past abuses do impress upon this fight.
And thoughts of riots, rights and rulings,
Spin in circles in the shadows of my mind.
I go to sleep at night and think of coding.
Is our savior high within the data cloud?
Is access to our care, as great as knowledge?
Where shall peacefulness be found?
Does freedom lie within a soup of letters?
Do PHR’s and IEP’s and EKG’s and HIT
Open doors to our gaining knowledge?
Is ARRA an acronym, or is it a primal roar?
Arghaa! Arise! An EPI pin, to stimulate
The growth of understanding,
That we are all Patients in the End.
Here, I take my stand. I can do no other;
For past abuses do inform this time,
And, two by two my Luther’s tell me
To demand my data rights ,
To be resolute, that separate is not equal,
And that no man,
Should stand
Between me and the Word.
Is 1135 a page in the Annals of Oncology about Kidney Cancer?
Or is it Volume 113 of Pediatrics no. 5 in 2004: “The Genetics of Autism.?”
Or is 1135… simply, “JESUS WEPT.”
I will see you in Galilee, Galilee, Galilee
I will see you
In the ring, the circle, the circuit,
And the wheals they are returning….
The wheels on the bus go round and round,
Round and round, And Rosa parked.
She refused to give up her seat at the table.
ICD-10, Do you intend, to save me from my coding?
Do you entreat, that we retreat?
And expect the patients, now informed and comprehending,
To sit idly by awaiting your instructions?
Physician Heal thyself,
And let empowered patients speak,
And draw attention to those that seek
A better and healthier tomorrow.
About the poem… in the poet’s words
I wrote this poem in the weeks leading up to the final healthcare reform vote in March 2009. At that point, I had done many interviews with reporters who wanted to focus on insurance reform and did not want to discuss data access, nor did most people really want to talk about viewing the patient as a whole person. So, I wrote a poem that would mention HIT, Health Reform, Autism, Child Abuse and Jesus. It is quite a heady mix. It can be hard to listen to. But patients are complex and if we truly listen to them we can change everything.
Regina Holliday
4 Comments
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
- Three’s a crowd « Flashfree - [...] start to take our healthcare back into our own hands. This idea is not a new one and the…
Liz, what a GREAT post. As I said on Twitter, this seems to cross some threshold of powerful writing. You’ve always had a great voice, but this has a new level of clarity and purpose.
Regarding women in the movement:
1. For me personally, the women’s movement is the model of teaching people what empowerment is. I cited this in my talk at the CDC social media conference in August. I *more* than welcome women taking any reins they want in defining this movement, because that community sorta wrote the book.
2. After thirty years of trying every imaginable approach to ending hunger, The Hunger Project has found three pillars of change, one of which is “Empowering women as change agents.” I can’t wait to see the same happen here.
3. For ages I’ve tried to predict the eventual levers of social change for patient engagement. Back in May, Diane Engelman’s story hit me – she fought for years to get her daughter the correct surgery. I realized there’s an e-patient subtype that I called “Mama Lion” – the mother who’ll stop at nothing to get her “cubs” what they deserve.
4. Then I thought back to Susannah Fox’s comment earlier this year that the most common e-patient demographic is women 30-55 who are researching for a family member. Aha: women taking the reins, doing what they can to protect and help their families.
That’s corroborated in my book by an interview with the nurse who was research coordinator for my clinical trial. She’d been a pediatric nurse and observed that parents would stop at nothing to explore options for a sick kid, but years later the same adult would be relatively wimpy as a patient him/herself. We titled that interview “Would you do it for your child? Then do it for yourself.”
Regina asks if “ARRA” is a primal roar. Another might be “Thou shalt not eff with my family.”
My view: It would be absurd for women to exemplify e-patient without also leading the movement in whatever role they want. Step right up.
Thank you Dave, for a thoughtful comment. I believe that women are poised to take the lead on this; they simply need to be convinced/educated of their role in the movement. It’s a natural fit, really.
Liz, this is a terrific post. You move the conversation on epatients, patient advocacy and ‘crowdsourcing’ (another term I’ve yet to see well defined) a step forward in your observation that women need access to the ‘right line of thinking.’ We can better help ourselves by combining our passion and deep feeling with astute analysis and a large dallop of common sense. Both breast cancer and menopause are topics pulled in different directions by emotional thinking, reasoning and appeals.
I’m very emotional — but I love to express them all the more when grounded in fact and experience.
The art and poem by your friend I will read again later, when the business of the day has subsided. The painting struck me so, and I want my mind unhurried when I read the poem.
Clink. Thanks for a great post!
Jody
Thank you Jody. This was a difficult post to write but as you noticed, the crux is combining passion with analysis and common sense. I love how you characterized it and I believe that women have an even stronger mandate to take back their health.